Repository navigation
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
 |
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Define the extension policy contract packages/go/openapi/src/schemas/model.graph-extension-retention-policy.yaml, packages/go/openapi/src/paths/graph-retention-policies.extensions.id.policy.yaml, packages/go/openapi/src/openapi.yaml |
The schema extends the graph retention policy schema with an extension_id integer. The operation documents its required Prefer header, path parameter, success response, and error responses. The main OpenAPI path reference remains commented out. |
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes
Change: Other
Suggested labels: documentation
Suggested reviewers: urangel
Merge Risk: 
f6562
-
This specification-only change has no established application behavior impact and is mergeable after normal checks.
Pre-merge checks: 
-
Check name Status Explanation Title check The title names the change: an API spec for the get extension retention policy endpoint, tied to BED-10188. The changeset adds an OpenAPI operation, schema, and commented-out path entries for that end… Description check The description follows the template structure: Description, Motivation and Context with the ticket linked, How Has This Been Tested, Types of changes, and the checklist. It has three gaps. The Descri… Docstring Coverage No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat… Linked Issues check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. Out of Scope Changes check Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. Full details: Title check
-
Explanation
The title names the change: an API spec for the get extension retention policy endpoint, tied to BED-10188. The changeset adds an OpenAPI operation, schema, and commented-out path entries for that endpoint, so the title matches the main change. The 'docs:' prefix fits a spec-only update.
Full details: Description check
-
Explanation
The description follows the template structure: Description, Motivation and Context with the ticket linked, How Has This Been Tested, Types of changes, and the checklist. It has three gaps. The Description section gives only one line and does not describe the added schema, operation, or commented-out paths. The Motivation section does not explain why the spec is needed. The testing note says the author ran
just gen-specbut does not describe the result, and it is unclear how a commented-out change was verified. The Motivation and Description sections are also thin. The Checklist marks documentation as up to date, which matches the change.Resolution
Optional improvements: expand the Description to list the new schema (model.graph-extension-retention-policy.yaml), the new GetExtensionRetentionPolicy operation, and the two commented-out path entries. Add a sentence on why the spec is needed now. Describe the verification result of
just gen-specand say how the commented-out entries were checked. Also, the 'Resolves BED-10188' line links the Jira ticket, but the checklist still points to GitHub issue 672, so confirm which reference is correct.
Full details: Docstring Coverage
-
Explanation
No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (3 skipped: 3 unsupported.)
-
Finishing Touches
-
Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
coderabbitai
Bot
added
the
documentation
Description
API spec update for BED-10188
Motivation and Context
Resolves BED-10188
How Has This Been Tested?
Before commenting out including the change, I ran
just gen-specand took a look at the API documentation to make sure it looked goodScreenshots (optional):
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit